Considering user options

I can ask for clarification regarding the user's post, asking if they want a summary, verification, source, or context analysis. Since they posted a headline, I think it's best to present quick options in concise Chinese without heavy formatting—maybe even bullet points. If they share a link, I could also fact-check. As of my last knowledge update, Salah had a contract with Liverpool until June 2025, after signing a three-year extension in 2022.Clarifying contract context

I need to be careful not to assert unknown details for December 2025. I can present known historical context up to 2024, like stating, "In the past two years, Saudi clubs made multiple offers for Salah, which Liverpool rejected, and his contract was until 2025." It's essential to add a caveat that circumstances may have changed. I should also parse the headline that mentions Salah criticizing Liverpool and discuss the implications of choosing between Saudi and European clubs, labeling it as analysis, not fact.Crafting a concise response

I want to clarify what the user needs: do they want to confirm authenticity, get a summary, a translation, analysis, a timeline, or see sources? For an immediate take, I can't verify real-time without a link. The headline uses "炮轰," which sounds sensational; if they share the article, I can check the quotes.

I'll mention that there have been Saudi bids since 2023 that Liverpool refused, highlighting the wage gap. Here's what I can do: 1) Quick verification (needs link) 2) Provide context and potential impact 3) Write a social media post/title 4) Translate to English 5) Summarize if they paste the original text.